I WILL SPAM EVERY COMMENT THAT IS GENERAL AND VAGUE

February 1st, 2012 by kamla

If you do not demonstrate in your comment that you have actually read any of the posts, I will spam your comment. PLEASE STOP SELLING THINGS ON THIS BLOG!

CHAPTER SEVEN, IN THE BEGINNING IS THE BABBLE

February 1st, 2012 by kamla

 

IN THE BEGINNING IS THE BABBLE

The greatest threat to our freedom comes from the fear that we will produce only inarticulate or meaningless sentences, that our prattling won’t make sense, we will sound foolish, everyone will discover, or worse, that we ourselves will discover, that we have brain damage. In short, the greatest threat to our freedom comes from the fear of babbling.

We fear that it is we alone who start from babbles, while others spin off the perfect poems or plays without any of these degrading and humiliating preliminaries. We believe that even the first drafts of our favorite authors look, for the most part, more articulate than our own first and second drafts.

Now, this word, ‘babble’ is another pretty interesting word. The root of the word is baba, and ‘baby,’ ‘balalaika,’ ‘baboon,’ ‘barbarian’ and ‘brave’ all derive from it.

Each time we begin something (and each day is a beginning, whether we are starting something new, or creating something new for the same work), we need to babble. This is the ground zero we need to start from. Who was it who said each time you put pen to paper you are competing with Shakespeare? God, what a frightening, intimidating, self-defeating  way to think. I have tried it. I am only paralyzed by it. It doesn’t mean I don’t dream about such comparisons, just that when I am beginning, instead of competing with Shakespeare, I am merely a baby learning to use its tongue. I am the baboon with a pen. I am the barbarian making sounds to communicate, to ask for help, to convince myself I am still alive. I am the brave fool venturing into territory that angels are afraid to tread. I am willing to hazard the conviction that you cannot find your own voice unless you are willing to babble.  

Babble without knowing what you are going to babble about. Don’t try to control or direct your babble. Let the babbling lead you in its own direction. Believe me, this entire book was once one long babble. It might still be. I’m not saying this to be self-deprecatory. In a certain way all books are babbles. “The true human experience,” says William Saroyan, “is the experience of the ignorant in relation to the unknowable.” Some babbles echo through the ages, some sink into silence after a brief span of singing, like a babbling seasonal brook, and some, like birdsongs in uninhabited forests, never get heard at all.

Babble without thinking whether you are making sense. Babble aimlessly, and in time you will find a direction. Babble senselessly and sense will begin to curdle and come to the surface. Sense is pervasive, there is no avoiding it. Our brains, which we always have enough of, are wired to make sense. Sense will happen soon enough. Babble meaninglessly, and meaning will break to the surface. Babble without concern for grammar. Scribble. How you will. Ungrammatically even. Just write. In fragments, in run-on sentences. It is better than to not write. Split your infinitives to your heart’s content.  e.e. cummings said:

Since feeling is first

who pays any attention

to the syntax of things

will never wholly kiss you;

 

Babble fearlessly“The first and great commandment is, don’t let them scare you,” Elmer Davis says in But We Were Born Free.  No scholar, teacher, critic, publisher can take away your right to the babbling brook that flows from the source of your creativity. You are in your Private House, in a high place of secrecy and safety. Here you are free to err, to make mistakes, stumble, fall. Here you are alone, nobody may judge you, except you, and you can make a pact with yourself not to judge your babbles.  A babble can be revised, expanded, shaped. If worse comes to worst, you can throw it away, and none will be the wiser. Or, if you get attached to your babbles, as I do, anal as I am, save them in a Babble File.

Babble with confidence. Babble boldly. Know that this is the mother of great works. Babbling is the seed, the beginning, the birthing. Most great works of art begin here. Dabble, babble, doodle, scribble, strum, thrum.

Babbling is holy. Create a space for it, a place for it. Set aside daily babbling time. I myself honor the Goddess of Babble, and have built myself an altar to her. Each writing session is started with a babble, like a prayer. I pray that my babbles become song, and hope that the brook of my creativity will survive mixed metaphors, bad grammar, terrible images, and someday swell into a sacred, undammable river.

                                                         ~

  DON’T CENSOR YOURSELF

“Hm . . . yes . . . man has it all in his hands, and it all slips away through his fingers from sheer cowardice . . . I wonder, what are people most afraid of? A new step, their own new word, that’s what they’re most afraid of . . . I babble too much, however. That’s why I don’t do anything, because I babble. However, maybe it’s like this: I babble because I don’t do anything. I’ve learned to babble over this past month, lying in a corner day in and day out, thinking about . . . cuckooland.”  Raskolnikov, in Dostoevsky’s Crime and Punishment.

*

Only those who do nothing . . . make no mistakes. JOSEPH CONRAD

*

The greatest mistake you can make in life is to be continually fearing you will make one. ELBERT HUBBARD

*

To make mistakes is human, but to profit by them is divine. ELBERT HUBBARD

*

Well, that’s the actual joy of it . . . when you don’t know what’s going to come out. I think you have to be able to find as a writer that state where you don’t know what you’re going to say or what the character is going to say or who the characters are. That’s the biggest thrill of all. When you start to trust that subconscious thing and you don’t censor yourself — just remember you can always throw it away — that’s when the good stuff comes out. STEVE MARTIN, in an interview published in the Los Angeles Times (Wednesday, December 9, 1998).

*

I thought to myself, I don’t have to show this to anybody. It doesn’t have to be good, so let’s keep writing and see what happens . . . it’s a thrilling way to write, it’s very liberating.

STEVE MARTIN

PERCEPTIVE CARTOON IN THE NEW YORKER

December 23rd, 2011 by kamla

This week’s issue of The New Yorker has a funny and perceptive cartoon by Leighton. Two guys on a couch, books in their hands, clothes and underwear on the floor, books, bottles, manuscripts, cell phones on the table before them, and one of them says, “I want to be so successful that it ruins my life.”

CHAPTER SIX, RECLAIMING YOUR FREEDOM

December 19th, 2011 by kamla

 

The adjective that best describes the Private House is the word ‘free.’ Here is another word that is very important to us human beings. To be free from bondage of any sort, to do and speak as we are compelled, to be at physical, mental and spiritual liberty, has been and continues to be our struggle and our desire. The words ‘free,’ ‘love,’ ‘peace,’ ‘precious,’ ‘safe’ all come from the same root, the Indo-European, pri. And add ‘dom’ to the double vowel in the open syllable, unchecked by a consonant, and the word booms and reverberates like a drum, a primitive, primordial drum expressing with its timbres and rhythms the beat of the irrepressible human heart: a drum made of the wood of the Tree of the World, perched on the branches of which birds sing, and louder sing than doubt.

An unconditional, fearless freedom is the primary condition, the very ground of creativity. “Without freedom, no art,” says Albert Camus. Freedom is the very soil without which no seed of truth and beauty sprouts and grows. If, for any reason whatsoever, we shackle our thoughts, tie up our tongues, put chains around our hearts, imprison our imaginations, repress words, and take away from ourselves the freedom to write however, whatever, we will never develop our voice.  Voice and freedom are inextricably connected, and in order to develop our voice we have to take the freedom, initially, to sing badly rather than not at all.

This freedom, which we are naturally heirs to, is easily threatened. The threat is both external and internal. Externally, we are judged by teachers, critics, our peers, magazine editors, judges of contests, editors at publishing houses, parents, etc. Anybody who doesn’t support or like our writing functions as a policeman of our talents, tonguecuffs us, and throws us into the prison of wordlessness.

The internal threat is not any the less serious for being self-created. Even when the external threat is lacking, we judge ourselves, dis-empower ourselves by our own negative self-talk, lack trust in our selves, and blight our songs by our doubts. Of all human perversities, the most amazing is the manner in which we ourselves are our own worst enslavers and silencers.

If you are one of those people who have ‘got to have to write,’ you have no choice but to wrest your freedom from all that threatens it, retreat to your private fortress, and get into the habit of giving yourself the freedom that nobody else is going to bestow on you.  This freedom has to be fought for and maintained with unrelenting vigilance. Writing is dependent upon a confidence, a chutzpah that you have to develop on your own. Naked and fearless inside this fortress, in this secret place, this high place of safety, you will need to practice to sing louder than your external and internal critics, to write what you please, doodle, babble, erase, keep. Nobody, absolutely nobody, can take this away from you if you don’t want them to. The Private House is your singing field, your grazing ground where you let the unsaddled, unharnessed horses of your imagination roam unrestrained in the unchartered territory of your thoughts and feelings, where you go trustingly where your thoughts and words take you.

Difficult as this may sound — and whoever said anything here was easy –you will have to draw a magical circle around your Private House and deny entry to the enemies of your freedom. For the time being. Especially in the beginning of the birth of anything, especially when you are as tender as a sapling . . . and we are, even the best of us, tender and vulnerable at the beginning of all songs. I say, ‘for the time being,’ because none of us can ignore them too long. And that, too, is just as well. Like the whale that swallows us, like demons that haunt us, our enemies come bearing gifts as well. In time you will learn how freedom makes sense, gathers its power from bounds, like rivers bounded by banks, like stars shining from the tracks of their ellipses. But for now, go ahead, be free to your heart’s content.

~

PURSUING OUR OWN GOOD IN OUR OWN WAY

The only freedom which deserves the name, is that of pursuing our own good in our own way. JOHN STUART MILL

*

Sometimes naked, sometimes mad, now wise, now foolish, thus they appear on earth, the free ones. ANONYMOUS (HINDU)

*

Every man has a right to utter what he thinks truth, and every other man has a right to knock him down for it. SAMUEL JOHNSON

*

Freedom is participation in power. CICERO

*

I want freedom for the full expression of my personality. MOHANDAS K. GANDHI

*

The superior virtue is not to be free but to fight for freedom. NIKOS KAZANTZAKIS

*

In the truest sense freedom cannot be bestowed; it must be achieved. FRANKLIN D. ROOSEVELT

*

The slave of fear: the greatest of slaveries. GEORGE BERNARD SHAW

*

Without freedom, no art; art lives only on the restraints it imposes on itself, and dies of all others. ALBERT CAMUS

*

There is not a single true work of art that has not in the end added to the inner freedom of each person who has known and loved it. ALBERT CAMUS

*

“A Robin red Breast in a Cage

Puts all Heaven in a Rage.”

WILLIAM BLAKE, “Auguries of Innocence.”

*

Bind me — I still can sing –

Banish — my mandolin

Strikes true within –

Slay — and my Soul shall rise

Chanting to Paradise –

Still thine.

EMILY DICKENSON

*

 

A CROOKED WAY TO STAY IN THE GAME, OR WORKING ON MANY LOOMS

October 12th, 2011 by kamla

I realized while doing my kirtan this morning that I can never stick to my plans for my music. I intend to do one thing, memorize and perfect one raga, memorize the aalaap and the taans, but again and again I am distracted from it: partially my own damn fault, but more, it is a survival issue. If I make the task too difficult, too boring, I will stop doing it altogether. My attention is the attention of a butterfly: tasting them all but not getting stuck to one flower. I have to flit, or I will die.

I had a dream in which dad said to me about my music, stay with phrases, small phrases, get them right. He always complained about my not ‘sticking with one thing.’ And he was right. What he didn’t know was that I didn’t stick to one thing long enough to get bored with and tired of it. Before that happens, I quit.

Let me define my ‘quitting,’ however: I don’t at all mean quit, quit, period, but quit for long enough to return to it in a fresh and exciting way. I am totally committed to my various disciplines: writing, music, physical exercise by way of walks and yoga, eating right. (I am not as committed to meditation as I would like. It is a marvelous thing to do when I get around to it, this creating space and time to be entirely with myself which is also entirely with the Self of the universe. I believe one is only truly free in meditation. But that is another topic.) I was saying, I am committed to my disciplines but have no hesitation at all of abandoning them when the need arises. I mean not only music, etc, but whole books.

In the past two years I have written 270 pages of a novel, COHERENCES, abandoned it for my fantasy novel MALINI IN WHIRLWOOD which I have been writing and abandoning for forty years, and finished about 65 % of my book on Guru Nanak (tentatively titled THE LORD OF DESIRE), and now am working on the novel again, but planning to abandon it soon (I can feel a weariness creeping in) for the Guru Nanak book.

From one particular standpoint the above might seem hopelessly scattered. It may be. But since I don’t like thoughts that bother me, I like to believe that this is my crazy, twisted, tortuous, miraculous, astounding (to me) process of creating, my way of staying in the game. Heraclitus said, CHANGE IS REST. Being a word junkie that is hopeful of having a fix till the day I die, this flitting from loom to loom is my way of resting from my interminable projects.

The dream with dad has strayed with me. I have whittled the definition of a phrase down to one or two notes. And instead of doing music for one hour at a time (it often happens), I am content with ten minutes, just staying on one note. I don’t give myself a hard time about this. This way I can stay in touch with music, at which I am always a beginner, and around which I have no ambition for an audience, till the day I die. But I do have such an undying and ever hopeful ambition about my writing. No amount of ‘wisdom’ or lectures to my ego diminishes it. Hence I have had to devise ways like shuttling from loom to loom to follow the waves of my energy and interest.

 

THE MAN IN THE BLACK HAT

October 11th, 2011 by kamla

I’ll tell you my New York story which has much to do with discouragement and audience. It is an embarrassing story, something I have not admitted to anyone else but the time has come to reveal it. The thing about ‘fessing up,’ as they say, writing and telling about it, is that it objectifies it so you can laugh instead of blush about it.

Way back in ’89 or ’90, when I was sending off my play scripts to theatres and getting a lot of rejections, I was thrilled to get a letter from Dramatic Risks, a new theatre company in New York started by Mark Grant Warren, saying something to the extent that “we love your script, CLYTEMNESTRA, and do we have your permission to do a staged reading of it in New York?” Of course I said yes. Who in her right mind would refuse New York? The big apple was beckoning and not only was I going to give them permission, but dig into my meager savings and fly out to New York for it.

So I flew East, with my then husband, the late Donald Powell (for the story about his suicide read my book of poems called AS A FOUNTAIN IN A GARDEN, to be available through Create Space on Amazon soon), to meet my destiny. We spent quite a penny, stayed at the Gramercy Park Hotel, and the day of the reading, strolled about in Manhattan and found a great bookstore. As I was browsing in the theatre section, looking for a book on Ben Jonson (I wanted to make him a character in my play about Shakespeare (the idea was abandoned though the play about Shakespeare did get written in ’98), someone came up to me and said, are you “Kamal Kapur?” (I only became Kamla in 2002).

I was amazed. I didn’t know anyone in New York. Who could this be?

“Yes,” I said.

“You are the playwright? Clytemnestra?”

“Yes.”

“I’ve read your play. It’s great!”

Wow! I was famous even before the reading. New York! New York!

“But how did you know it was me?”

“I was part of the selection committee.”

“But how did you know it was me?”

“You’re in the theatre section, you’re Indian, your play is going to be read this evening,” replied our Sherlock Holmes.

I walked out of the bookstore on air. The anticipation of the evening was thick and heavy. There would be crowds there. Perhaps even overspill; people standing in the isles, perhaps even, as in the old days, beautiful, eager young people sitting on and around the stage. I was on the verge of my career as a playwright taking wing.

The evening came and off we went to the rather large café that had offered itself as the venue for the reading. I was a bit disappointed it wasn’t a theatre, but I knew that great things have humble beginnings, so shrugged it off. The actors, whose movements had been choreographed, walked about the stage, script in hand, reading their parts in a rehearsal. The time for the opening drew closer, but where were the crowds? Where was Sherlock Holmes? Over on a table in a corner sat a lone man in a hat, crumpled over a drink, but present, and observing. Mark looked embarrassed, and the actors, each of whom was also probably hoping for a break – a well-known director in the audience, perhaps, who would gobble them up after the reading. But no, though we delayed the opening a bit, no one else, absolutely no one else showed up. A few bar tenders, a few waitresses, Donald and I, and, of course, the lone man in the hat were the sole audience. He stayed throughout. When the play was over two hours later, he walked up to me, shook my hand, looked straight at me, and walked out without a word.

The narrative ends here. It would be futile to attempt to describe my disappointment and discouragement. We returned to California, and as time passed, a resolution formed inside me. I would always address myself to the man in the black hat: an audience of one, as in Coleridge’s The Rhyme of The Ancient Mariner, would do for my purposes.

THIS BLOG ENTRY IS ALSO IN MY OTHER BLOG

WRITING BACKWARDS IN PATCHES

September 30th, 2011 by kamla

I’ve found another way to write and I’m quite excited about it. Backwards, in patches. I had finished reading the first 270 pages of my novel, COHERENCES, which I began in 2009 and abandoned in 2010. I knew I couldn’t begin to work on the novel for it felt like too momentous and heavy a task. I spent a month re-reading and reorganizing my files in order to refresh my memory. A few days ago I thought of writing in patches, backwards. Since I have the book sort of sketched out, and know its scenes (for the most part, though often the plan gets abandoned because of something unexpected happening in the chapter), I worked on one of them as on a patch for a quilt.  It works! I find that working in patches also clarifies the plot further.

 

CHAPTER 5, DEFENDING YOUR TERRITORY

September 29th, 2011 by kamla

CHAPTER FIVE

DEFENDING YOUR TERRITORY

 

Help comes, if we are open to it, from unexpected sources. It was the Goddess of Vegetables who came to my rescue, and routed the block with tomatoes. For weeks and months the block had me in thrall. It was the dark hole around which I orbited endlessly. I couldn’t just say, ‘oh well, this is what is happening now, or not happening now,’ and leave it at that. I wasn’t wise enough to know that with patience and persistence it would inevitably pass, to enjoy the block, as it were, take blessed time off for all those ‘life’ activities that I so like, but rarely indulge in: leisurely mornings with P, staying in bed, discussing our dreams, or simply being in bed, silent, touching; unmeasured time at the breakfast table, reading the paper, he with his coffee, me with my chai, peeling fruit, making toast; walks on the beach, or sitting by the fire with the cats, reading. No, I am not smart enough, yet, to use my blocked time well. I belong to that race of people who feel the healthiest and the best when they are writing, which makes, of course, for much happiness and much misery, since writing must inevitably be preceded and followed by not writing, as sound, silence.

During the Big One, all I could do at home was crawl into bed, think about everything that was wrong with my life, and stew in the juices of my misery. No wisdom, no philosophy, came to rescue me from the intense rawness of my emotions. My life became dependent and conditional. I kept telling myself that I would deserve to live only if I could do this and this and this, and get that and that and that. Thoughts of suicide were beginning to enter my mind. The voice of failure was beginning to negate and erase me.

At this very point the Goddess called to me. I dragged myself to get out of bed to go buy groceries. In the grey parking lot, in the store, pouring over the cheeses to decide on one, I felt the knot in my stomach, the pain in the heart, the fumes in the head, the paralysis.

But something happened over by the vegetable counter. Holding the plastic bag in my hand, and feeling the tomatoes for ripeness, ‘too soft, too hard, just right, this will keep for a few days,’ a word floated into my mind, a totally irrelevant word that mobilized my moribund energies, infused me with courage, curdled the amorphous blobs of feeling in my heart into sense and nonsense, pointed a direction, and started my ascent up into light.

The word, not sweet in its sound or its sense, but nevertheless powerful in its effect, was:  enemy. The sentence it was embedded in was, ‘the voice that tells me I am no good is the voice of the enemy.’  

No sooner did the word and the thought come, than I shifted into the offensive mode, the warrior mode. I am a Sikh, you see. I come from a race of warriors, started by ten warriors who worshiped through word and song. They were singing warriors, men who loved peace, poetry and justice so much that when the Muslim leaders interfered with their right to be, to worship, to sing, they picked up arms to defend not only their own right but the rights of all people everywhere to sing and worship as they please.

At the heart of Sikhism is word, and song. Sikhs believe in the magical properties of word and name: “Naam,” they call it. The proper word at the right time conjures, dispels, empowers. In the material world, the word is truth, evoking the highest, God, if you will. Words, the names of things, are connected intimately with the things that they evoke. Though the Thing Itself remains beyond words, indescribable, words connect us to it. Words, mere sounds so potent that they can give birth to worlds, revive the dead. By remembering a word, a name, you can be rescued. It doesn’t matter what your name for that which rescues is: it could be Jehovah, Jesus, any of the hundred names of Allah, any of thousands of names of the Hindu gods. The name has the power to rescue and save you. This is what the Sikhs believe. They worship the word. They build temples to it. They sing the word, fight battles in its name.

And there is always need to do battle. A metaphoric war is no less of a war. The battlefield here, the battlefield of the gods, is the human head and heart. This is where we have to wage a daily, hourly war against the thoughts and the feelings that would defeat us, take away our territory, and our voice. Every time we defend ourselves, speak our opinion, speak our truth to our bosses, our spouses, our friends or neighbors, we are potentially drawing lines of war, establishing territory. To survive as a writer we have to wage war against the forces that would gag and silence us. In this battle for Voice we have to keep our symbolic swords handy. There is really no difference in this battle between the word and the sword. I have always found the spelling of these two words very interesting. ‘Sword’ contains ‘word’, and the sibilant, ‘S’.  ‘Sword’ contains a hissing sound, like the sound of a snake. Which brings me to a very relevant digression, and a wonderful story by Ramakrishna.

The Snake Who Lost His Hiss

The elders of a village went to the Saint where he was meditating in a cave in the mountains, and complained about Nagarajah, an evil snake that had terrorized the village.

“His hiss can be heard for miles around,” they said. “He bites and swallows our cattle, our dogs, our children, our men, our women. Even the bravest among us have become afraid to venture out into the fields which are dry, parched, uncultivated. Our granaries are depleted and empty. Our numbers are dwindling from death by the snake, and by starvation. Help us, Guru, you alone can subdue and vanquish him. ”

The Saint, realizing the gravity of the situation, descended to the village, and went to the  large, spreading bodhi tree. This used to be the tree under which children played, yogis meditated, and lovers lay in each other’s arms under the moonlight. But no more. Now at its coiling, twisted roots, the snake lived in his burrow.

“Come forth, O Ancient One,” the Saint called, and the snake crept out of his hole,  slithering and undulating, his scales shimmering in the sunlight. He was dark and shining in his majesty, awesome in his length and his beauty. He glided to the Guru, and coiled up meekly at his feet.

“Oi, what is this I hear about you being the scourge of the village? Leave your destructive ways. Be good. Don’t kill needlessly. Stop biting them. Leave them alone,” the Saint said.

Because the snake had good karma, because he could be made conscious of the consequences of his acts, and because he had the sense and the power to obey the Saint, he returned to his burrow, resolved henceforth to leave his evil ways, and be good.

The fields yielded grain, the children came out to play, the lovers loved, the brave came out with their bows and their arrows, and the villagers were once again at peace.

One day, several months later, the Saint passed by the tree in the village, and found the snake coiled near the root of the tree. He was utterly transformed. His scales had fallen off, he looked mangy, emaciated, innocuous, limp. He had sores all over his body. He looked like he was on the verge of death.

“Oi, what happened to you?” the Saint asked.

“This, O Guru, is the fruit of obedience, of being good. I obeyed you, I gave up my evil ways, I let the villagers alone, I stopped biting them, I stopped eating their livestock, and what happened? Look what they did to me. The children come and throw stones at me. Even the rats dance on my head. I haven’t eaten for months. I am simply waiting to be eaten when I die.”

“This is your own fault,” the Saint replied. “I told you not to bite them, but I didn’t tell you not to hiss.”

Okay. So hissing is very necessary. One needs to hiss in order to defend one’s space. We all have to keep our hiss. The words ‘enemy’ and ‘war’ mobilized my energies, got me hissing.

“Die?” I thought, with the tomato, like a grenade, in my hand, “Hell, no. I’m not defeated that easily. I will write about wanting to die.”  I cheered up almost immediately. “All of this will become fodder for the book. I will write a book for writers, such as myself, who are almost vanquished by The Block, by thoughts of being ‘failures.’ My feelings about not being a good writer will become the material for the book. Yes, one must find food to survive, and really, if one is cunning and resourceful, one can find food almost anywhere. If there is one thing a warrior does not do is succumb to despair. Enough, enough of this diffidence and fear. I will rout it. I will take out my sword, or rather my pen, and defeat it with words. I will tell my writing story, Mr. Death. I shall sing as I damn well know how. Babble and chirp to my heart’s content. I will write because I have ‘got to have to write.’  Nothing, absolutely nothing is going to keep me from it. Not the fear that I am not good enough, or skilled enough, or bright enough, or important enough. Not the fear that the book may never have an audience, never be published. Not the fear that I may never get my reward for my labors. I have already got the first reward for this book — the sabbatical. A whole year off to babble! They can’t revoke that . It’s not the kind of book they are paying me to write, but I won’t let anyone dictate to me the kind of book I should write. I’m the one that’s going to be putting in the labor and the time. I must benefit from the writing of it before anyone else can. The physician who heals himself can heal others. The guru who has traversed the path can guide others. My trek through the valley of death will familiarize me with the terrain so I can sketch a map of it for others. I will be ruthlessly honest. I will tell where I fell, where I was hopeless, and how and when I picked myself up and carried on. This will be a tale of how I became a Writing Warrior.”

Standing quietly in the midst of the vegetables and the fruit, I resolved to return to writing. Words are my vegetables, my tomatoes, my potatoes, my meat. They are my daily bread. They are my weapons to deal with my demons. They are my own, private fortress. I am the queen here. I will write it as I choose to write it. I will make it subjective and objective, move freely between objectivity and subjectivity, between expository and narrative. So, I don’t want to write about blocks in general, I want to write about blocks in particular: mine. I want to get personal and dirty. I don’t want to be safe. I want to get into the muck of this business. I want to tell the truth as I see it, even if it means risking judgment. I will tell my writing story. I won’t think too much about what I want to say, but just kind of sit down and do it, instead of think about doing it. My story does count. It matters to me. I don’t give a damn whether it will matter to anyone else, whether anyone else will ever read it or not. I will write here in the same spirit I learned to play the flute in the beginning, just by blowing into it hard and in an uncontrolled way, enjoying the sound of my breath, loud and strong, till the notes came, uneven and wavering. I will be fearless. I will take the bull by the horns (so what if this is a cliché and I am mixing my metaphors), I will take charge here, not let this dejection take away from me my singing rights.

I return home with my tomatoes. I leave the groceries unrefrigerated and return to the computer. I am in a fighting mood, and I want to tackle and overcome this demon that has been terrorizing me for weeks and months. I’ll write this damn thing as a way to come to terms with my block.

Blank pages frighten us because they are full of possibility. They are too white. We need to stain them in order to make them ours. We need to make our marks and our scribbles on it, like snail trails, spoor, just to claim some territory as our own.

I blab all over a page, anything that comes to mind, to tell myself I am not afraid.

 My body is feeling like lead, the brain dense with regret, I am entirely encased in matter this morning. I will start here, then, I will start with a description of this hard stone, I will hone myself on it. I will sharpen my wits on it. I will whet my brain on it. I don’t know which metaphor to use, so I’ll let them all stay till I can decide on one, and use it further. I should decide on it now, so I can proceed. I will sharpen myself on it. Yes, it is this, then, that I like so much about writing, that it sharpens me. Writing is my stone. Writing is my drano, it unclogs my brain. It melts my matter and gives me wings. Too many metaphors again.  I want to return to the image of the sword again. I will be a warrior. The pen will be my weapon. Is this image of pen as lance obsolete? But charging into battle with a keyboard just doesn’t make it as a metaphor. I like the idea of the pen as a lance. I would be ashamed if someone saw this scribble, but the warrior in me doesn’t give a shit. I am like Mufumi in Kurusawa’s The Seven Samurai. Such an animal. Such a delight. So very alive. He is for the time being, for the duration of this book, my role model. Perhaps I will have several.

As I scribble, I am stumped again in a major way, by a reminder of something John Ciardi says in his essay On Writing and Bad Writing (and this is the terrible side of having read too much, of having taught writing too much): a bad writer, he says, ‘is out for release, not for containment. He is a self-expresser, not a maker.’ For an entire day I am paralyzed again, till the warrior rescues me once more:

John Ciardi is saying that writing is not therapy, it is not a stone, it is not drano, it is not a sword. He is debunking the personal use of words. He is telling me what I cannot use language for. Nobody tells me what I cannot use language for. Language is my birthright.  Every idea that keeps me from using it as I please, every idea that belittles who I am is bullshit. I will reject it. For the time being.

I plough through the voices of criticism, of restraint, of authority, of fear. “Shhhh” I say to them, and when they don’t respond, I hiss loudly, shoo them out of my territory. I draw a magical circle around myself, like Rama drew around Sita, like the one around the poet in Kubla Khan, a protective circle that keeps away the abducting, destructive voices that would muzzle mine. Not only silence them for the time being while I’m trying to get a rough draft out, but also vindicate my ways. What I wish to do in this piece of writing is to reassure my readers, through my own example, that it is okay to be messed up, that somewhere we all are, that chaos, anxiety, doubt, fear are normal, human, and that there is a way out. That words are one very important way out. That one can reclaim them at any stage of the game. But I cannot do this without letting the readers into my private space, into the area where I use language as an expresser, first, in order to be a maker. Expressing is a stage, a means, a way to making. There are no either/ors here. One leads to the other.

Arriving at this conclusion makes me feel good about myself. And before and during writing it is important for me to feel good about myself, to have confidence and faith in my own, personal way of writing and being. I have just challenged a heavy weight critic, and I have, in my opinion, won. I want to pack one more punch. In making this division between expressing and making, Ciardi has expressed what sounds to me like a full-blown certainty, “Certainly any student who ever brought full-blown certainties into my class was invited to leave,” he says. I invite Ciardi to leave.

For now I must bulldoze and ride roughshod over Ciardi’s ideas, any ideas, no matter whose, mine or someone else’s, that obstruct the process of my writing. This bulldozing is the imperative need of writers who want to continue to write. I have learned, in the process of writing this book,  that one of the most important lessons that a student of writing can learn  about writing is that s/he will never be able to write anything at all if s/he  gets too hung up on how s/he ‘should’ write. To the devil with shoulds.

And in the middle of riding roughshod over a heavy weight, I change the title of the book, from The Write Attitude, to The Writing Warrior. And with this change come a host of holy metaphors, and an arsenal of words like ‘courage’ and ‘fearlessness,’ to assist me in my resolve.

Warriors defend their right to write. Period. Regardless of the quality, the quantity, the objective “worth” of their writing. It helps to think of the object of defense as a territory where you are safe and free. This territory, which is constantly under attack by internal and external forces, and which needs to be defended with constant vigilance, I call the Private Fortress. Let’s change that to Private House. I like houses. One can do as one pleases in them. They are private, protected territory. A  fortress with a metaphysical mote around it. Where you are the master and mistress. Where you can be as naked as you please. Where you can sleep and rest or sit in the sun, or take an hour to write a sentence. Where you can be what and who you are. Where you can lounge about in your pyjamas and freewrite all day, dangle your modifiers to your heart’s content, litter your floors and walls with run-ons and fragments. Where you decide who comes in, when, and who stays out till you are good and ready to let them in.

 The Private House is the opposite of the Public House, or rather, Public Palace. This is where others see your work, where you get rewards for what you do privately. Here we say, “come in, come look, come praise my house. See how wonderful and clean, organized and pretty it is.”  We convert our house into the Public Palace, display and strut our stuff when we want appreciation, rewards, recognition. It is the Public Palace that is the cause of most of our blocks.

Don’t get me wrong. I am not saying it is wrong to want to be in the Public Palace. It is natural and human to want an audience, to see oneself in the mirrors of other eyes, to desire to communicate, to make a difference, to be of service to mankind, to express for those who cannot.

On this important subject later. But for now, just remember: Don’t let the public poison the private.

All writers have to keep wresting this Private House. It is always threatened, and it always needs to be defended. It needs to be wrested from everything that threatens it — and everything threatens it. It is constantly under siege. Critics threaten it, editors of publishing houses, judges of contests, newspapers, news from the outside world of successes that are not our own, the successes of people we know and do not know, threaten it. And ultimately, we ourselves threaten it by allowing ourselves to be vulnerable to external threats, by taking ourselves too seriously, by being too attached to the rewards of our efforts. All of this is human and natural, and till we can live in our fortress with our doors flung wide open to the world, to the winds of every criticism, securely anchored within our confidence of who we are, what our needs are, we will have to keep our doors securely fastened, or we will have to symbolically, ritualistically, destroy all eyes that invade this private and sacrosanct house. It is our singing ground. This territory is not negotiable, not for sale, not up for judgment or criticism, not for others’ eyes.

~

I SHALL KEEP SINGING! 

Birds will pass me

On their way to yellower Climes –

Each — with a Robin’s expectation –

I — with the redbreast –

And my rhymes –

 

late — when I take my place in summer –

But — I shall bring a fuller tune –

Vespers — are sweeter than matins — Signor –

Morning — only the seed of Noon –

 

*

 

What I can do — I will –

Though it be little as a Daffodil –

That I cannot — must be

Unknown to possibility.

EMILY DICKENSON

*

I am going to sing for you, a little off key, perhaps, but I will sing. I will sing while you croak, I will dance over your dirty corpse . . .

To sing you must first open your mouth. You must have a pair of lungs, and a little knowledge of music. It is not necessary to have an accordion, or a guitar. The essential thing is to want to sing. This then is a song. I am singing. HENRY MILLER, Tropic of Cancer.

*

 

CHAPTER 4, THE BLOCK

September 2nd, 2011 by kamla

 

KNOWING THE ENEMY: THE BLOCK

Block. What a solid sounding word, heavy and dark: ‘Obstruction; Sudden cessation of a thought process without an immediate observable cause, sometimes considered a consequence of repression. Block. A road block. A  person’s head, as used in the phrase, knock one’s block off. A blockhead. Such a piece upon which chopping or cutting is done: an executioner’s block.’

Block. Sounds echo sense. The word represents a feeling, a thought, a biological and psychological reality. Sounds reinforce sense. Block. A mere word sits like a boulder on the throat of a spring. No, a mountain on the mouth of a river of words. It feels like a column shoved down the mouth. Cannot a word . . . another, more beneficent word, a kinder word, knock it off its perch, defeat it, replace it? But what word? No words remain. The block has blocked them out. The brain is frozen, the tongue tied in knots, the hand paralyzed. The body, the city, the state, the continent, the very earth of one’s being barren and dry, like the land of the Fisher King without the Holy Grail, the chalice of molten, fluid, words. Block. A mere word erases us, takes away our voice. The Block — the writer’s Enemy Number One.

This word triumphs in the writing world. We are either writing, or we have the block, like the plague. We apply the word, we misapply it when we can’t, or don’t, or won’t, due to multifarious reasons, write. There are hourly, daily, weekly, or full-time blocks. And they attack at any stage during the process of writing, before the beginning, in the beginning, in the middle of the middle, at the end, after completion, and anytime during and in between.

 

Although there are as many kinds of, and reasons for blocks as there are writers, it is safe to say that they are caused by two separate, and related, emotions: fear and desire. These are the poles between which we swing when we hate or love writing, when we think it is difficult or cake. These, fear and desire, the Eastern gurus have told us, are at the root of most of our problems. Though they appear to be the opposite of each other, they are in fact two sides of the same coin, the yin of the yang, and, when we are not conscious of their existence, they both have the same effect, that of making us miserable and unhappy.

 

I know that most of my blocks stem from these two extremes. My fears revolve around not being good enough, of failing, of succeeding , of revealing too much, of alienating people I write about, of being judged, of running out of time, of dying before I complete a work, of going insane in the pursuit of the right metaphor or phrase, of not having and having a voice. All of these can also be seen from the perspective of desire, since I desire the opposite of what I fear. I want to write well, in a free and flowing way, quickly and perfectly, to get published by major publishing houses, to get great reviews, to be praised and admired and loved for my brilliance, to please and impress, to be considered a great writer,  to succeed to the full extent of my definition of ‘success’,  to win The Big Prize, to make a million dollars, to be on talk-shows, in the glowing flashes of camera bulbs.

 

Fear and desire cannot, as far as I know, be extirpated. They are there for a reason. When they are proportionate and reasonable (are they ever?), they make us more aware, improve us as writers, motivate us to achieve our dreams. They can either do this, or make us sick, mentally and physically, and even kill us. I know. They killed my former husband, Donald Powell. Literally. He put a pistol in his mouth and blew his brains out.

 

So I watch this formidable enemy very carefully. When I can, when it isn’t choking the words and hope out of me, I study it, parse it, break it down into its parts, and examine it under a microscope. I want to get to know it, to understand some of its insidious ways, so I can develop strategies to rout it. Once and for all? I know better. This enemy is here to stay. To try to dispel it would be like trying to destroy the weft of the fabric of life. Perhaps the appropriate metaphor here might be: get to know it; embrace it, even.

 

My latest block, the Big One, was triggered, upon analysis, by all of the above reasons. I had applied for a sabbatical so I could have some time off  to write. Or was it, to rest? So I came up with this idea of writing a book about writing for creative writing classes.  I threw together a project to write a motivational handbook on writing, called The Write Attitude. It would be a brief book identifying the psychology behind the various kinds of blocks, and the solution. One, two, three, four. Simple and easy. I thought I would rip that off in no time, get it over with, then get down to the real business of completing my novel.

 

But it was the ripping it off in no time that was the problem. There is a gap between our intentions and our achievements, our conscious wills, and the will of the world, our dreams and our realities. This gap is the place where the mysterious universe goes to work to provide us with those experiences — often difficult and painful — that we need in order to fulfill our deeper selves. As soon as you have an idea that you are committed to, life gives you the experiences you need to realize it. If your book is going to have any real depth, that is. So what do I get? A huge, I mean, a humongous block.

 

 

The worst ever. The longest, deepest, blackest block imaginable. It is only now, much later, in retrospect, that I can attempt to describe in words my descent into the nine circles of this hell. The thing about infernos, like blocks, is that they are wordless. “Where words break off no thing may be.”  One can only talk or write about them in the past tense.  “That for which we find words is something already dead in our hearts,” Nietzsche wrote, in The Twilight of the Gods. While we are experiencing the dark night of the soul, we are speechless, and humorless.  This applies to our best experiences as well. When I was going through my block I was quite simply an amorphous blob of unhappy, desperate feelings that felt irrevocable and final. The only thing I could articulate was generalities like, this is it, this is the end of the path. From here on there is only darkness, wilderness, insanity and   death. I have failed utterly.

 

Well, actually, I must retract a bit here. Though I have said that blocks are wordless, this is not strictly speaking, true. Blocks have voices of their own, subtle, insidious, subliminal sounds whose purpose is to choke and silence us. They can be loud with words, leaden words, not the ones that make us fly, but the ones that sink us with their weight.

 

 

My block appeared as a voice inside my head. Even this decision to use the word ‘voice’ was delayed for days, and fraught with terror (they will think you are schizophrenic). I was riddled by the fear that I wasn’t good enough to write this book (what kind of word is riddled’? Isn’t it a cliché?). I wanted to include a personal narrative (what makes you think that your story counts, or is interesting?’), but couldn’t proceed with it. The title of the book, especially, The Write Attitude, threw me into the slough of despond (you, who are not writing a word, you, who have not published anything in the last several years, you want to tell other blocked writers what the write attitude should be?)

 

One morning I decided it was time to go to the desk and assert myself, reclaim my voice a little, at least. I turned on the computer, and put the word “Introduction” in bold letters on top of the page, and expected to begin writing in an inspired frenzy. My brain felt like a keyboard without electricity.  I stared at the word for weeks in a state of paralysis. The word looked so portentous (shouldn’t it be ‘pretentious’?) (And shouldn’t the question mark be outside the parenthesis? They will find out that this English teacher doesn’t know her stuff).

I try to stall. I push back my cuticles with an orange stick. I reach for the clippers, push the sharp edge beneath the loosened flaps of skin, and cut them. The little slivers of dead, white skin fall on my black sweats. But this activity is not restful, like it is when I do it in time of leisure, in the same spirit of mindless bliss as the monkeys in India grooming each other, picking lice and eating them. I am not with the activity. I know I should be writing the introduction to the book that hasn’t been written, and may never be written. But I’m going to push hard this morning, assert my mind over this matter. I am in a battle against time. Sabbaticals don’t last forever. But The Block has the upper hand, the louder voice (the tense is all wrong here). I am not up to the battle. I procrastinate some more. I make myself a cup of tea. I swallow two gingko bilobas to give more oxygen to the brain. I think these and some caffeine will get the machinery of my brain cranking. But nothing happens, in the brain, that is. While the stomach gets sour, my brain remains recalcitrant as a donkey. And when I return to the desk, The Block is still there, his vacuous face, with ‘introduction’ written in capital letters on his forehead, staring back at me from the computer screen.

 

I try to brainstorm, as I have told my students again and again to do when they are stuck. I write, “I have been stuck on writing this fucking introduction for weeks now.” I scratch it out, in propriety’s name, and write, “beginnings are hard . . . for me?” (who gives a shit about you?). I scratch that out, too. The voice borrows my hand and writes, “this sucks.” Nothing works. Stalled mental peristalsis. Nothing moves the bowels of my mind.     

 

I begin to get that flutter of a feeling, starting in my belly, and spreading all over me. In this vacuum of self confidence, the enemy moves in, overwhelms me with a barrage of voices.

 

Your brain is dead, stupid. You’ll never get this sabbatical project done. Your writing career is over. Worse, you never really had one. Sure, you won a few national awards in India for your plays; sure your plays were produced there, and your poems translated into several languages, and published, and your articles in newspapers and journals, but that was only because you were a big fish in a little pond. What have you done in America? Sure, you got a book of poems published, but that was only because Donald knew someone, because he believed in you as a writer. Sure your poems got published in several magazines and your short story in an anthology, and you were selected by The New Mexico Arts Division as their Playwright -in-Residence, but look at all your rejections! They would fill up a filing cabinet. And all your unpublished work will fill up another one. Your successes are insignificant compared to the successes of others. Perhaps you were good once, in your youth. Or perhaps you were never any good. If you were, where are the crowds? Where are the reporters and the interviewers?

 

Yes, the reporters and the interviewers. I wanted them. I wanted the introduction to be powerful, something that would make the scholars sit up in their seats and take notice. Here was a voice that made sense in the wilderness of voices. And the style. Such clarity. And the critical reasoning . . . flawless. And poetic too. Long sentences with rhythms that sound like a stream flowing over boulders. Syntactically innovative. Bends language to her uses. A vocabulary that sends even be bearded old lexicographers (you don’t even know how to spell the word, idiot) to the Old English Dictionary. And the organization of the book . . . brilliant. Each chapter like a hologram, complete in itself, yet connected to the larger whole. Wow!

 

I knew enough from teaching creative writing classes at Grossmont College that if you want an audience, and most of us do, it is important to target them, since something written for everybody in general ends up being for nobody in particular. I had a vague, unquestioned, unexamined image in my mind about who I was writing for, and to. I wanted to address myself to, and please, the academic scholars: perhaps the critics and teachers of writing at Yale, Harvard, Berkeley. I have been intimidated by and in awe of them all my life. I have admired the way they manage to sound so impersonal, objective, factual. Feelings and confusions don’t clutter up their writings which have the high style, and the ring of, truth. Yet here I was, being a woman, being touchy-feely, anything but ‘scholarly,’ and getting knee-deep into the muck of my emotions.

 

I wanted to write like a male, for a male audience. I have wanted to do this from the moment, the exact moment of my birth, from the slipping out in a slush of blood and green goop, from the moment the midwife looked between my legs and told the women in the room that I was a girl, from the moment my grandmother pivoted on her heels and walked out of the room, with a sneer, and the words, ‘it’s only a girl.’ From that very instant I have tried to prove her wrong, and despaired of doing so. In the struggle for my voice I have not known whether to be a baritone, or a soprano. I have swung between these two, and sometimes in the discordant screeches in between. It’s only now, at the age of fifty that I realize I don’t have to write like a male for a male audience to have a voice, that I can glory in my femaleness, that even the ‘maleness’ I have acquired along the way, has added to the richness of my voice. But it’s been a long, hard struggle.

 

But that was not what I meant to write about, not in this chapter, at least. I had meant to talk about that other cause of blocks, desire. Misguided, or genuine. Combined with feelings of fear, of being ineffectual and inadequate, are an entire spectrum of desires, from the minuscule to the major, that are equally disempowering. Even at the level of grammar, the desire to write correctly, without fragments and runs ons and punctuation errors, has contributed to my block. My desire to write and sound like a male, and to appeal to a male audience blocked me severely as did my desire to write an introduction so brilliant as to make the critics sit up and take notice. My desire to write a bestseller, make enough money to retire from teaching, make more than that, millions, perhaps, and not only that, but be famous as a result of it, be on talk-shows, be the target of paparazzis, also worked their poison in strengthening the block. A block is not only a “failure of ego,” as Norman Mailer has said, but can also be an over-inflation of the ego.

 

There is a perversity at work here, “an obscene self-confidence” hand in hand with “an ongoing terror,” as John Barth puts it. I will make a million, I will kill myself; I am a genius, I’m a moron; this is brilliant, this sucks.  I am reminded of a character in a Tolstoy story — I have

forgotten the name (how unprofessional to admit of a lapse in memory. Don’t use the example, then) — who is a painter. There is a scene in which he looks at his canvas and thinks that his painting is marvelous, great. But the next day he hates it, and thinks it is terrible (Who do you think you are, comparing yourself to Tolstoy?).

 

Tolstoy’s painter embodies the contradiction in each of us.  We are tossed about between angels and demons, both equally deluding and false, both, when they are unbalanced, equally defeating, equally capable of  choking our voice, of keeping us from that song that comes from the quiet, peaceful, private heart space, where we are free to simply be, and simply do.

 

But this see-saw, I believe, is unavoidable and necessary. It is part of the contradictory nature of life itself, woven as it with light and shade, hope and despair, rivers and blocks. All we can do is watch it, and hope that watching it, being conscious and aware of it, will mitigate it somehow. And not only watch it, but accept it with the wisdom that there is a deeper purpose at work here. “Without contraries,” says William Blake in his Marriage of Heaven and Hell, “is no progression.” This swinging between these poles also has an evolutionary purpose. Fear and desire balance us. And this balance, hard as it is to attain, and fleeing when it is attained, is what we are striving for in our lives and in our writing. In time we will also see that even this imbalance that we so deplore also has a purpose in that it provides the fodder without which there would be no art.

 

The unavoidable, ubiquitous block has to be suffered through, and ultimately, when it is over, as it will be, just as inevitably, embraced and accepted. Blocks are caused by our desire to be better writers. They make us compete against ourselves, push against the borders of our limitations. In time we will see that not all enemies destroy us. Some strengthen our resolve, strengthen our character, and even teach us a lot along the way. If we persist on this journey to find our own voice in this cacophony of warring voices, we will see that the purpose of these extremes is to make us better writers, that “the road of excess,” in Blake’s words, “leads to the palace of wisdom.” Fear and desire can teach us that humility without which we cannot learn, and that self-confidence without which we cannot act.

The Block will pass if we persist upon the path. Persistence is the key here. We need to realize that though blocks can stall us, they need not stop us in our tracks. Sometimes we need to push through them, and sometimes we need to wait them out, in passive stillness, with attention, knowing that, in the words of Milton, “they also serve who stand and wait.” This dichotomy, this imbalance, this suffering, this doubt and this despair, are all part of the game, part of the process, part of what we must expect to encounter at every stage of this journey. And if we can commit ourselves to it, we shall, with the proper combination of attitude, faith and strategy, overcome.

 

But when we are as tender as seeds in the dark earth on the verge of sprouting or dying, eager to endure, let us harken to the voices of the masters who have guided us though darkness again and again. Let us listen to the voice of Virgil that whispers the sweet honey of these words into Dante’s ears as he journeys through his hell:  “Take heart. You need not be cast down. Whatever plot these fiends may lay against us, we will go on.”

 

In time we will find out that we are our own worst enemies. For now let us transform the enemy, by our seeing, into an ally. Let us, since the word, and the sense it echoes, must be, rejoice in it.

 

So. Block. ‘A supporting or strengthening piece. A building block. A piece of wood, stone, or other substance prepared for engraving. Block. The casting containing the cylinders of an internal-combustion engine. Block. To support, strengthen or retain in place by means of a block or blocks. Block. To plan or project broadly without details; sketch out. Block. To raise on a block, or blocks, as a house or boat. Block. Middle English blok(ke), from Old French bloc, from Middle Dutch blok, trunk of a tree . . .’

. . . perched on the branches of which (awkward use of preposition) songbirds sing, and louder sing than doubt.

 

~

OUR ANTAGONIST IS OUR HELPER

 

He that wrestles with us strengthens our nerves and sharpens our skill. Our antagonist is our helper. EDMUNDE BURKE

 

*

Love your Enemies, for they tell you your Faults. BENJAMIN FRANKLIN

*

 

We has met the enemy, and he is us. WALT KELLY

 

*

The best way to destroy an enemy is to make him a friend. ABRAHAM LINCOLN

 

*

WRITING AND GOING TO THE GYM HAVE MUCH IN COMMON

August 26th, 2011 by kamla

Okay. The same word I say when I go to the gym. It means, take it on. Writing and going to the gym have much in common: some days it’s fun, and some days it just has to be done, and some days it won’t happen for whatever reason, and then you just have to feel relieved and enjoy your day. Both have to do with maintenance, of the brain and body, and both involve discipline and exercise. The benefits are similar, too. Oxygenation, a release of endorphins, a sense of fulfillment and well-being that the day’s task is done, guilt assuaged. Well, actually, not guilt, though there definitely is an element of ‘ought’ about it, but more a question of dharma, karma, and doing the business of the living, and doing it well and with devotion and presence, even though death, with its keen eyes in which all the involvements of the quick are as chaff, knocks upon the door with its gifts of silence and stillness.